Skip to main content

    Do Your Agents Deserve Ritz-Carlton Treatment?

    I was thinking today, we can overcomplicate this business.

    We debate splits, technology stacks, lead generation, office footprint. And somewhere in all of that noise we forget the thing that actually holds a brokerage together. How people feel when they walk through your door.

    Horst Schulze said it best. “Guests do not primarily want luxury. They want to feel like they are wanted and cared for.” That is it. That is the whole game. And he proved it by studying 400,000 guests at the Ritz-Carlton until the data was undeniable. When the first contact with a guest was excellent, a complaint never followed. When it was negative, a complaint always followed. Almost every time without exception.

    He called his philosophy simple. Ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen. Every person in that building, regardless of their role or their title, was expected to treat every other person with dignity. Full stop.

    The brokerage firm I led, was built around that same belief. And I want to be direct about something. I never tolerated disrespect from an agent toward my staff. Not ever. Not from a top producer. Not from anyone. Production does not buy you the right to treat people poorly. Ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen means it goes both ways. The moment you let one person erode that standard you have told your entire team what they are actually worth to you.

    Onboarding Is Your Ten-Foot Rule

    Schulze also created the ten-foot rule. Every employee, regardless of role, stops within ten feet of a guest, makes eye contact, and says welcome. Not hi. Welcome. Because hi puts two people on equal footing. Welcome tells someone you are there for them. Steve Jobs flew to Atlanta to learn this before he opened a single Apple Store and built it into every retail location. Apple Retail became one of the highest revenue per square foot operations in history. It started with a man obsessed with the first moment of human contact.

    That first moment is your onboarding. The day an agent signs with your brokerage is your ten-foot moment. What do they feel walking in? Is there someone who makes them feel like they made the right call or do they get a packet, a login, and a good luck? I have seen brokerages spend thousands recruiting an agent and lose them inside 90 days because the onboarding experience told them they were just a number. Win that first moment and you build a foundation. Fumble it and you spend the next year trying to earn back trust you never fully established.

    Retention Is a Daily Decision

    Onboarding gets an agent in the door. Retention is what keeps them. And retention is not a program. It is a daily decision made by every manager and leader in your office.

    At my firm we made one promise – and delivered it – to every agent. Broker and compliance support within one hour or less on weekdays and two hours on weekends. No exceptions. I monitored it personally every single week. That promise told our agents something no recruiting brochure ever could. When it matters we are here.

    Schulze gave every Ritz-Carlton employee authority to spend up to $2,000 on the spot to resolve a guest complaint. In his final three years the full amount was used exactly once. The point was never the money. It was knowing someone had their back.

    But get this, I have watched too many acquisitions go sideways because new ownership looked at the P&L and started trimming what they could not explain. When Schulze left, the new Ritz-Carlton leadership cut the escort standard, walking guests to their destination instead of pointing. The brand fell from number one in the world to number twenty-six. One cultural decision. I have seen the exact same collapse happen in brokerages after a sale closes. The thing that looked like overhead was the entire reason agents stayed. Culture is not a cost center. It is the moat.

    Before you cut anything ask what it is actually paying for. Not just functionally but emotionally. Your agents have options every single day. They stay because of how your office makes them feel.

    Ladies and gentlemen serving ladies and gentlemen. Protect that standard. Lead like it matters.

    Because it is the whole business.

    Win the day.


    A System Will Produce What A System Will Produce, Nothing Less and Nothing More!

    The Power of Positive Intent

    In the real estate world, things get heated. We deal with high commissions, emotional sellers, and the constant pressure of recruiting and retention. It is easy to feel like a difficult agent, a frustrated client, or a pushy affiliate is out to get you.

    When a deal hits a snag or a team member pushes back on a new policy, our reflex is often to get defensive. But there is a better way to handle the friction.

    Indra Nooyi, the former CEO of Pepsi, shared some advice in a 2008 interview with Fortune Magazine that completely changes the dynamic of a difficult conversation. She suggests that whatever someone says or does, you should assume positive intent.

    Flipping the Script

    Nooyi points out that when you assume negative intent, you get angry. You react. You might even scream or get defensive. But if you take away that anger and assume they actually mean well, your approach shifts.

    Think about the last time a top producer came into your office complaining about a change in the commission split or a tech glitch. It is easy to think they are just being difficult or ungrateful. But what if you stopped and thought, “Maybe they are reacting this way because they are stressed about their own overhead or they just don’t understand the ‘why’ behind the change?”

    As Nooyi explains, when you assume positive intent, you start to truly listen. You start trying to understand if they are hurt, upset, or just confused. You stop being “random” in your response and start being a leader.

    Breaking the Cycle of Negativity

    In our business, the heat of the moment is a daily occurrence. If you react from a negative perspective just because you didn’t like how someone else reacted, you end up with two negatives fighting each other. That doesn’t close deals, and it definitely doesn’t build a great office culture.

    When you make the effort to assume the best in people, they usually notice. They might even realize their own reaction was over the top because they see you are actually trying to help.

    Why It Works for You

    This isn’t just about being “nice.” It is about your own emotional intelligence. When you aren’t busy being angry or defensive, you have the headspace to solve the actual problem.

    Next time a conversation starts to go sideways, try to get behind what the other person is saying. Assume they have a good reason for their frustration. You might be amazed at how much faster you can find a solution when you aren’t busy fighting an invisible enemy.


    Doing the right thing is always the right thing.
    Doing the right thing is always the right thing.

    The Perfection Trap

    I’ve noticed a pattern in our industry. We are surrounded by high achievers who want everything to be “top tier.” Whether it is a new recruiting deck, a luxury listing presentation, or the perfect office layout, we tend to chase that final 5 percent of polish.

    But here is the truth we rarely talk about: Perfection is expensive.

    That last tiny bit of quality almost always costs a disproportionate amount of time and money. If you are a broker owner or a top producing agent, you know that your time is your most valuable asset. Spending ten hours to make a flyer “perfect” instead of “great” usually means you missed out on three listing appointments or a chance to coach a rising star.

    The 95 Percent Sweet Spot

    My favorite type of purchase—or project—is the one where you spend 80 percent of the cost but get 95 percent of the value.

    Think about the tech stack in your office or the marketing materials you provide your team. There is often a massive jump in price or effort to get from “really good” to “flawless.” In reality, that extra 5 percent of perfection is rarely what closes the deal or recruits the agent.

    The best combination of cost and quality is almost always one step down from perfect.

    The Cost of Over-Engineering

    When we over-engineer our systems, we create two problems:

    1. The Time Sink: You spend weeks tweaking a CRM or a script that should have been launched in days. While you were polishing, your competition was already in the field using a version that was “good enough” to win.
    2. The Decision Fatigue: Chasing perfection for every minor detail exhausts your mental battery. By the time a truly high-stakes decision lands on your desk, you are already drained from worrying about the font size on a business card.

    Finding the Value

    This isn’t an excuse for sloppy work. Quality matters, and in real estate, your brand is your reputation. But there is a huge difference between excellence and perfectionism.

    Excellence is about delivering high value and moving the needle. Perfectionism is often just a sophisticated way of procrastinating or overspending.

    Next time you are looking at a new vendor, a new hire, or a new marketing campaign, look for that one step down from perfect. That is where the profit lives. That is where the scale happens.

    Give yourself permission to be 95 percent great so you can use that saved time and money to actually grow your business.


    Symptom, source and solution.
    Symptom, source and solution.

    The Hidden Trades of the Real Estate Hustle

    In our industry, we are taught to be “yes” people. We say yes to the late night showing, the last minute recruiting lunch, or that extra project that landed on our desk Friday afternoon. We usually view these as signs of hard work. But there is a reality we often ignore: trades are always happening, whether you see them or not.

    Every time you say yes to one thing, you are inherently saying no to something else. It is a simple equation that we frequently miscalculate.

    The Invisible Exchange

    Think about the daily trades you make without even realizing it:

    • The Early Meeting: When you say yes to that 7:00 AM strategy session, you are saying no to a quiet morning or time with your family.
    • The Extra Project: Saying yes to a new internal audit or a side committee is a direct no to a free weekend.
    • The Energy Drain: Saying yes to a high-maintenance client who exhausts you is a no to the time and headspace that actually fulfills you.

    For broker owners and top agents, the cost of a “bad yes” isn’t just the hour you spent in a meeting. The real cost is whatever could have grown in that space instead. Maybe it was the visionary recruiting plan you never got to write, or maybe it was just the rest you needed to stay sharp for a big negotiation.

    Improving the Ratio

    The point isn’t to start saying no to everything. You can’t grow a brokerage or a career by hiding from opportunities. The goal is simply to recognize the difference between a good yes and a bad yes.

    A bad yes usually feels like an obligation. It is the task that keeps you busy but doesn’t actually move the needle. In recruiting, a bad yes might be bringing on an agent who produces well but destroys your office culture. You said yes to the volume, but you just said no to the peace and retention of your existing staff.

    How to Audit Your Yes

    Start looking at your calendar as a series of investments rather than just a list of things to do. Before you agree to the next “opportunity,” ask yourself what you are giving up to make it happen. If the trade doesn’t feel fair, it probably isn’t.

    Protect your space. Improve your ratio. When you stop filling every gap with a “bad yes,” you finally leave room for the things that actually matter to grow.


    Sometimes you win, sometimes you learn.
    Sometimes you win, sometimes you learn.

    The “Unreasonable” Talent Play: What Real Estate Leaders Can Learn from Google’s DeepMind Deal

    The “Unreasonable” Talent Play: What Real Estate Leaders Can Learn from Google’s DeepMind Deal

    Every brokerage owner knows the feeling of a competitor eyeing their market. They have a bigger budget, deeper pockets, and an aggressive recruiting team. How do you actually beat them?

    A recent Wall Street Journal article titled “The Inside Story of the Greatest Deal Google Ever Made” tells the story of the 2014 acquisition of DeepMind. Google paid over 500 million dollars for a tiny startup with 50 employees and zero revenue. At the time, critics called it insane. Today, it is considered the bargain that saved Google’s future.

    For real estate CEOs, recruiters, and top producers, this story offers three blunt lessons on winning the talent war.

    1. It is Never Just About the Money

    In 2014, the real battle was between Google and Facebook. Mark Zuckerberg was incredibly close to buying DeepMind himself.

    Google’s Larry Page didn’t win by offering more cash. He won because he understood what the founders actually valued: autonomy. They wanted a guarantee that their work would stay independent and ethical. Page promised them a private ethics board. Zuckerberg didn’t.

    The Real Estate Lesson: When a top producing team is deciding between you and a rival, it is rarely just about the commission split. It is about the “intangible equity.” Are you offering a platform where they can scale their own brand, or are you forcing them into a rigid corporate box? Google won because Page was a better listener.

    2. Pay for the “Bargain” That Feels Too Expensive

    Paying 500 million dollars for 50 people was called “unreasonable” back then. Today, DeepMind is the engine behind Google’s most valuable AI systems. That original investment is now worth billions.

    The Real Estate Lesson: As the market shifts, the best deals often look overpriced on paper. Acquiring a ten person super team from a rival might require a payout that makes your accountant nervous. But the DeepMind story teaches us that true “force multipliers” are rarely priced at fair market value. A 10x player pays for itself exponentially. The greatest risk isn’t overpaying for elite talent. It is missing out on the talent that defines the next decade.

    3. Don’t Fear the Culture Clash

    The article highlights a constant tension between DeepMind’s academic culture and Google’s profit-driven world. DeepMind wanted to change the world. Google wanted to protect its ad business. For years, this friction was actually healthy. It allowed DeepMind to innovate while Google provided the infrastructure to make that innovation work in the real world.

    The Real Estate Lesson: We see this clash all the time. You have the legacy listing agent who does things “the old way” and the new tech-enabled team that demands automation. A successful broker doesn’t force everyone into one mold. Your job is to manage the tension. Let the different groups thrive separately while building a bridge so they can learn from each other.

    The Bottom Line

    Google’s DeepMind deal was about one thing: securing the most critical asset for the future before anyone else understood its true value.

    In our market, the principle is the same. The brokerages that will dominate the 2030s aren’t necessarily the ones with the most desks today. They are the ones with the vision to attract the talent and technology that others still think is “unreasonable.”

    Follow my AI series – AI Lazy | Blue is the new White | Your Job Is To Be Human | Who We Hire IS Changing |


    A System Will Produce What A System Will Produce, Nothing Less and Nothing More!

    Why Your AI is “Lazy” (And How to Fix the System)

    “A system will produce what a system will produce—nothing less, nothing more.”

    I’ve observed many of the talented folks I work with and know using LLMs lately, and I’ve noticed a recurring pattern. Even the smartest people often treat AI like a magic search engine rather than a mechanical system. They give a complex instruction, and the AI returns a half-baked summary, invents a fact, or forgets a rule set ten minutes prior.

    The frustration is real, but the problem isn’t the AI—it’s “AI Drift.”

    When your system lacks mechanical boundaries, the output reflects that chaos. To get elite-level work, you have to move past “chatting” and start “engineering” your prompts with specific constraints. I’ve collaborated with top-tier prompt engineers to codify 6 “System Guardrails” that solve these common points of failure:

    The 6 Advanced Guardrails

    1. Anti-Laziness Protocol: Use this when the AI uses [...] placeholders. It treats the output as brittle, machine-readable code where a single missing line causes a “system crash.”
    2. Fact-Grounding (Anti-Hallucination): This locks the model into a “Source-Only” mode. If the data isn’t in your document, the AI is commanded to halt rather than guess.
    3. Pagination Logic: For massive tasks, this forces the AI to work in “chapters,” stopping for a “CONTINUE” command to ensure it never loses the thread or hits a token limit.
    4. Recency Bias (Hot-Rules): AI forgets early instructions in long threads. This forces the AI to recite your 3 most critical constraints at the start of every response.
    5. Chain of Verification: This requires the AI to act as its own “hostile reviewer” inside a <thinking> block, catching logic errors before it gives a final answer.
    6. Strict Syntax Enforcement: This strips conversational “fluff.” It ensures your output is 100% clean JSON, CSV, or code—zero “Here is your file” preamble.

    If your AI isn’t performing, don’t blame the model—audit the system. Because at the end of the day, a system will produce what a system will produce.


    A System Will Produce What A System Will Produce, Nothing Less and Nothing More!

    The Broken Rung: How AI is Changing Who We Hire (And How We Train Them)

    In my ongoing series of blogs on AI, (Blog 1 / Blog 2 / Blog 3) I have been dissecting how this tech is moving from a shiny new toy to the actual infrastructure of our businesses. Lately, the conversation has shifted. Whether I am at the front of a lecture hall at the University, mentoring a student at the Community College, or sitting across from a broker looking to scale their staffing, the question is the same:

    Who is actually going to have a job in three years?

    The AI revolution is creating what we called in the Army a Pincer Movement. This is a multi pronged maneuver that is effectively trapping the traditional workforce in the middle. On one side, AI is squeezing the life out of entry level knowledge work. On the other, the physical trades are advancing and capturing more market value than ever.

    Here is how this maneuver is hitting our industry and the workforce of tomorrow.

    1. The Hollowing Out of Middle Management

    In my staffing business, the trend is undeniable: the entry level assistant role is fundamentally changing. AI agents now handle the research, the initial lead scrubbing, and the basic document drafting that used to be the training ground for new hires.

    • For Brokers and Owners: Your broken rung is the talent pipeline. If AI is doing the junior work, how do we train the next generation of senior leaders? We have moved from hiring doers to hiring AI Orchestrators — people who can audit and refine what the machine produces.
    • For Agents and LOs: If a machine can give a client an interest rate or a property value, your value isn’t the data — it is the interpretation. In 2026, the Experience Premium is the only thing that justifies your commission. Your clients are paying for your gut instinct and negotiation grit, not your ability to pull a report.

    2. The Great Academic Pivot: University vs. Community College

    Teaching at both levels gives me a unique vantage point on where the smart money is going for education.

    • The University Crisis: We are seeing a decline in traditional 4 year majors that focus on codifiable skills like basic accounting or entry level Computer Science. Students are realizing that a $100k degree in a field that AI can do for $20 a month is a bad investment. The University is being forced to pivot toward high level strategy, ethics, and complex leadership.
    • The Community College Renaissance: This is where the real agility is. Community colleges are the Special Ops of education right now. They are launching 6 month AI literacy certificates and New Collar training faster than a University can approve a syllabus. For my staffing clients, these agile graduates are often more plug and play than a 4 year grad who spent four years learning theory.

    3. The Human Hand Advantage (Why Trades are Winning)

    While we are focused on screens, there is a massive boom in the trades. I tell my real estate students this all the time: AI can prepare a contract, not negotiate one. It can check a contract for compliance but it cannot crawl into a crawlspace to fix a burst pipe.

    • Infrastructure is King: Every AI brain needs a physical home. The demand for electricians and HVAC technicians to build and maintain the data centers powering our industry is at an all time high.
    • The Wealth Shift: High performing agents should keep an eye on these Blue Collar clients. The plumber who owns a fleet or the specialized welder is the one buying the $2M property tomorrow. Their income is protected by the one thing AI has not mastered: physical dexterity in an unpredictable world.

    The Bottom Line for 2026

    Whether our team is recruiting for your firm or grading a midterm, my advice is the same: Do not compete with the machine on speed; outpace it on empathy and complexity. The future belongs to those who use AI to handle the mundane so they can spend 100 percent of their time on the human to human work that actually closes the deal.


    Is your team currently AI heavy or Human heavy? I am currently helping firms run a Skills Gap Audit to see which roles are at risk and which are primed for growth. Would you like me to send you the template I use with my staffing clients?


    What's Possible?
    What’s Possible?

    The Mirror Doesn’t Lie

    I used to think I needed a perfect map before I started anything. I wanted a 26.2-mile view of the road and a guarantee that the obstacles were manageable.

    But after 12 Spartan races, the LA Marathon, a Century Ride in Iowa during the summer heat and the meat-grinder of Army Boot Camp and Officer Basic, I’ve realized that “waiting for clarity” is just a polite way of staying comfortable.

    Rumi was right: As you start to walk on the way, the way appears.” In my experience, the “way” never shows up while you’re sitting on the couch or staring at a blank business plan. It shows up when you’re mid-burpee in the mud or trying to solve a logistics nightmare in the office. Clarity isn’t a prerequisite for action; it’s a reward for it.

    Finding the Friction

    The philosopher Heraclitus said “character is fate,” and that character is forged in friction.

    I’ve learned more about myself at Mile 18 of a marathon or during a high-stakes business pivot than I ever did when things were “optimal.” When the glycogen is tapped out and the market shifts, the filters drop. You can’t “pose” as a resilient person when the friction is real.

    The course whether it’s a trail in the mountains or a boardroom is a mirror that doesn’t lie. It shows you exactly who you are when the air-conditioning and the excuses are stripped away.

    The Takeaway

    If you’re waiting for a “perfect” moment to start that project or hit that goal, you’re just avoiding the mirror.

    • Start walking. The path only reveals itself to people who are already moving.
    • Respect the friction. The stress, the resistance, and the setbacks aren’t just obstacles; they are the forge.

    If you don’t like the reflection you see in the middle of the struggle, don’t quit. Stay in the friction until you’ve forged a character you can live with.

    Embrace Ambiguity
    Embrace Ambiguity

    The Real Cost of Winning: Lessons from the Pros

    I spent the morning at a breakfast with Carson Palmer, Ryan Tollner, and Katie Rodin. We talk a lot in real estate about “winning,” but these three have a different definition of it. Whether you are leading a brokerage, running a desk at a title company, or out there as an agent, their take on ethics hits home for our industry.

    Character attracts character

    Ryan Tollner is a top sports agent who admitted he entered a “slimy” business specifically to do it better at a higher level. He was very open about the fact that being ethical has cost him clients. In our world, we’ve all seen people say or do whatever it takes to get a listing or a signature. Ryan’s strategy is simple: position yourself as different. When you operate from a place of abundance, you realize there is enough business for everyone. You don’t have to chase the “scarcity” mindset that leads to cutting corners.

    The “Double Life” trap

    Katie Rodin made a point that every leader in our industry needs to hear: you cannot be one person in the office and another person out of the office. If you aren’t aligned, the cracks will eventually show. Carson Palmer backed this up, saying it is impossible to be consistent if you are cutting corners behind the scenes when no one is looking.

    When the pressure is on and you’re tempted to take a shortcut, Carson’s advice is simple: pause and pray. He reminded us that your name is your only real currency. His athletes know they represent the name on the front of the jersey and the one on the back.

    When things go sideways, don’t hide

    We’ve all had a deal blow up or a mistake happen at the closing table. Katie’s advice for those moments is gold:

    1. Make it right immediately.
    2. Reverse engineer the mistake to make sure it doesn’t happen again.
    3. Lead by example. Don’t hide behind your title when you mess up.

    Creating a safe space for your staff and agents to own their mistakes is how you actually eliminate them in the long run.

    Coaching the person, not the production

    Carson mentioned that when an athlete’s performance drops, he looks at what’s going on in their life. Whether it’s a kid or an NFL pro, the human needs are the same. If an agent or a staff member is struggling, ask about the underlying issue. Usually, if you coach the person, the performance turns around on its own.

    The support system

    One thing that really stuck with me was Katie mentioning her spouse is a critical part of her success. In real estate, our families feel the heat of our schedules as much as we do. Acknowledging that support system is part of being an authentic leader.

    In an industry where our reputation is everything, these reminders are a great gut check. A reminder that playing the long game is how we win the day.


    Doing the right thing is always the right thing.
    Doing the right thing is always the right thing.

    The “Floor of Truth” and the Broken Rules of 2026

    Leaders and Students,

    As I was listening to the Fed statement this week, my ears perked up. As many of you know, my daily reality is a bit of a balancing act. Besides being the Managing Partner of a real estate staffing firm and a licensed CA real estate broker, I teach these concepts at the Masters, Bachelors, and Associate / Certificate levels. Whether I am in the boardroom or the classroom, I am looking for the signal through the noise.

    The Fed just released its decision to keep interest rates steady at a target range of 3.5% to 3.75%. While “no change” might sound like stability, the real story is in how the Fed is grappling with a sudden shift in the economic landscape.

    The moment the conversation turned to the Phillips Curve, I knew we were at a turning point and a teaching example for my students. While this sounds like academic jargon, for those of us in real estate, it is the “Floor of Truth” the Fed uses to decide the cost of your next project.


    The Fed’s Dual Mandate: The Goalposts

    To understand today’s “hold,” you have to remember the Fed’s two assigned goals for monetary policy:

    • Maximum Employment: Promoting a labor market where anyone who wants a job can find one.
    • Price Stability: Keeping inflation in check, with a long-standing target of 2%.

    Today’s decision is a direct result of the Fed trying to balance these two competing goals amidst global volatility.


    What is the Phillips Curve?

    In 1958, an economist named A. William Phillips noticed a pattern: an inverse relationship between unemployment and wage growth. Later, economists made the connection to inflation explicit.

    • The Logic: When unemployment is low, the labor market is “tight.”
    • The Chain Reaction: Employers offer higher wages to attract talent; those workers spend more, which drives up prices.
    • The Historical Trade-off: For decades, it was believed you couldn’t have both low unemployment and low inflation simultaneously. If you wanted to kill inflation, you had to accept higher unemployment.

    Why the Rules are Breaking in 2026

    In the years leading up to 2020, the curve “flattened” meaning we had record-low unemployment without a massive spike in prices. But today, the situation has reversed and become much more complex.

    The Current “Ambiguity Gap”:

    We are currently seeing low unemployment, but inflation is not cooling off. Instead, core inflation is sitting at roughly 3.3%. This is being pushed higher by soaring oil prices linked to the Middle East conflict and new tariffs. This defies the “soft landing” narrative and creates a massive gap in the data where old-school models are failing to explain the present.


    Strategic Deep Dive: Has Globalization Dismantled the Model?

    One of my Masters level students, Enyo, raised a sharp point in our discussion: Does the globalization of the economy essentially dismantle the direct relationship between inflation and unemployment?

    Powell admitted yesterday that our current inflation isn’t reacting to “standard Phillips Curve” policy. Instead, he is citing the “runoff” of one-time shocks like tariffs that take a year to bleed through the system.

    Globalization has changed the game. While inflation is now globalized through trade and energy, real estate remains fundamentally local. You cannot outsource a framing crew or a property manager. This creates a disconnect: we face global capital costs, but we still rely on local wage elasticity to drive our rents.


    The Executive Lesson: Synthesis over Certainty

    Chairman Powell’s focus on these models tells us the Fed is in a high-stakes moment of Synthesis. They are trying to determine if the relationship between jobs and prices has fundamentally shifted due to these outside shocks.

    In our industry, we face this daily. You might see low vacancy rates but stagnant rent growth due to outside economic pressures. When the standard models don’t make sense, your value as a leader isn’t just in your IQ: it’s in your Judgment to see the truth amidst the noise.

    The Takeaway: The Fed is holding steady because the “rules” of the Phillips Curve are being rewritten by global conflict and trade policy. They are choosing Functional Decisiveness, holding the line rather than making a “perfect” move that might arrive too late to save the economy from these new inflationary shocks.

    See you in the boardroom or in the classroom.

    #WinTheDay


    Ambiguity
    Ambiguity